Post by Stephen Calhoun ยป Sun Sep 25, pm. Post by Jeff Endress ยป Sun Sep 25, pm. Post by Stephen Calhoun ยป Mon Sep 26, am. Post by Stephen Calhoun ยป Fri Sep 30, pm. Post by Stephen Calhoun ยป Sat Oct 01, pm.
Post by Stephen Calhoun ยป Thu Dec 08, am. Quick links. Logout Register. The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood. Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions. You suggest that I might step back given a particular instance, a very personal instance between two persons in this case, but you haven't given a reason to do this. You've said 'it would be best to' do so, but haven't offered why 'stepping back' is preferable.
If not, don't worry. Just forget about it. Whereas, me in the guise of 17thc doc, 13th is going back a bit too far, wonders why this stepping back is a good idea. To me it is a very easy question.
Think of the outcome, is it productive? Does it build, destroy, confuse or add nothing? Of course everyone would answer these questions differently. You ask why step back then mention we have all learned to step back. Why did you learn? You then again wonder why it is a good idea. Is this an argument you fight out daily in your mind? Very few people really have quick enough instincts to survive. They would all be food the for the bear, if left alone in the woods.
So to step back is usually a very safe move, even for the bear. Giving one time to asses, plan, and then move. Even a millisecond of quality thought is worth more than none. The bear works off instincts and memory, he remembers the the Brier patch, and badger. Another view would have us look at Pakistan and India or Israel, Palestine or two Irish brothers in a bar. On the other hand, you probably do not want to step back to far, as the view is always interesting. Right answers is the wrong term.
